Request an Invite
We are committed to keeping our clients informed on those critical topics that affect state governments. Click the link to ensure you are invited to our next webcast.
Incident Prevention, Identification and Management Opportunities
Last year’s Joint Report from OIG, OCR and ACL on Incident Management highlighted the findings of two different OIG reviews if state operated programs where ...Read More
MHPAEA: How to Decrease the Cost and Burden of Parity Analysis
Substantial state and managed care resources are expended to analyze parity compliance for Non-Quantitative Treatment Limits. Fortunately, the NQTL Information...Read the Article
Mercer understands states must consider cost containment and program sustainability, network development and capacity needs and how to incentivize high-quality performance through effective procurement and contracting. States must consider how they will finance these services and understand the regulatory requirements of funding streams. Requirements related to the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) final rule, the Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) final rule and the Medicaid Managed Care final rule all impact the design and implementation of a state’s SUD service system.
Mercer assists states in SUD program design, development of federal state plan amendments and CMS waivers, procurement activities, actuarial rate setting and analysis, managed care contracting, value-based purchasing, staff training and development, and conversion from fee-for-service to a managed care delivery system.
Prior to 2011, the state’s Medicaid program did not include SUD treatment services as a covered benefit. State general funds and/or federal block grant dollars were the primary source of funding to pay for SUD services to Medicaid-eligible members. In an effort to contain costs while also expanding access to SUD services for Medicaid-eligible members, the state decided to add SUD benefits to its Medicaid state plan and incorporate these benefits into its managed care structure.
The state wanted to expand coverage and capacity for an array of ASAM levels of care and support adoption of medication-assisted treatment. The state wanted to support providers and managed care organizations in this transition by helping them fully understand service definitions, provider qualifications and billing expectations. The state also recognized the need to gather current SUD program and staffing information from providers in order to assist in provider reimbursement and capitation rate development.